VuXML ID | Description |
4eeb93bf-f204-11ec-8fbd-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- Command injection vulnerability
The OpenSSL project reports:
Circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly
sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were
found by code review.
Discovery 2022-06-21 Entry 2022-06-22 openssl
< 1.1.1p,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.4
openssl-quictls
< 3.0.4
CVE-2022-2068
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt
|
ea05c456-a4fd-11ec-90de-1c697aa5a594 | OpenSSL -- Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt parsing certificates
The OpenSSL project reports:
Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt() reachable when parsing certificates
(High)
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root,
contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime
moduli.
Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that
contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit
elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed
form.
It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a
certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters.
Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the
certificate signature, any process that parses an externally
supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service
attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted
private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve
parameters.
Thus vulnerable situations include:
- TLS clients consuming server certificates
- TLS servers consuming client certificates
- Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from
customers
- Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from
subscribers
- Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters
Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the
attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS
issue.
Discovery 2022-03-15 Entry 2022-03-16 Modified 2022-03-16 openssl
< 1.1.1n,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.2
openssl-quictls
< 3.0.2
libressl
< 3.4.3
libressl-devel
< 3.5.1
FreeBSD
ge 13.0 lt 13.0_8
ge 12.3 lt 12.3_3
ge 12.2 lt 12.2_14
CVE-2022-0778
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt
SA-22:03.openssl
|
fceb2b08-cb76-11ec-a06f-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities
The OpenSSL project reports:
- The c_rehash script allows command injection (CVE-2022-1292)
(Moderate)
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell
metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed
by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically
executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary
commands with the privileges of the script.
- OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing
certificate (CVE-2022-1343) (Moderate)
The function
`OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response.
In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the
response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in
the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify.
- Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite (CVE-2022-1434)
(Low)
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite
incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key
trivially predictable.
- Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys (CVE-2022-1473)
(Low)
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table,
containsa bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed
hash table entries.
Discovery 2022-05-03 Entry 2022-05-04 Modified 2022-05-05 openssl
< 1.1.1o,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.3
openssl-quictls
< 3.0.3
CVE-2022-1292
CVE-2022-1343
CVE-2022-1434
CVE-2022-1473
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
|
96a21236-707b-11eb-96d8-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities
The OpenSSL project reports:
Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()
CVE-2021-23841 (Moderate) The OpenSSL public API function
X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash
value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within
an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors
that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if
the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently
result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential
denial of service attack.
Integer overflow in CipherUpdate CVE-2021-23840 (Low)
Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate
may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the
input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an
integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the
function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length
value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave
incorrectly or crash.
Discovery 2021-02-16 Entry 2021-02-16 Modified 2021-08-25 openssl
< 1.1.1j,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.0.a12
FreeBSD
ge 12.2 lt 12.2_10
ge 11.4 lt 11.4_13
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt
CVE-2021-23841
CVE-2021-23840
CVE-2021-23839
SA-21:17.openssl
|
0132ca5b-5d11-11ec-8be6-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- Certificate validation issue
The OpenSSL project reports:
Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl
(Moderate)
Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client
side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may
return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for
example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by
OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or
SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to
SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY.
This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the
application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback().
Since most applications do not do this the
SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be
totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a
result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it
could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect
responses.
Discovery 2021-12-14 Entry 2021-12-14 openssl-devel
< 3.0.1
CVE-2021-4044
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20211214.txt
|
a28e8b7e-fc70-11ec-856e-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes
The OpenSSL project reports:
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised
implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some
circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was
preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of
"in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed.
Discovery 2022-07-05 Entry 2022-07-05 openssl
< 1.1.1q,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.5
CVE-2022-2097
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt
|
96811d4a-04ec-11ec-9b84-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- multiple vulnerabilities
The OpenSSL project reports:
SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow (CVE-2021-3711: High)
Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings (CVE-2021-3712:
Moderate)
Discovery 2021-08-24 Entry 2021-08-24 Modified 2021-08-25 openssl
< 1.1.1l,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.0.b3
FreeBSD
ge 13.0 lt 13.0_4
ge 12.2 lt 12.2_10
CVE-2021-3711
CVE-2021-3712
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt
SA-21:16.openssl
|
1aaaa5c6-804d-11ec-8be6-d4c9ef517024 | OpenSSL -- BN_mod_exp incorrect results on MIPS
The OpenSSL project reports:
BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on MIPS (Moderate)
There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring
procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the
TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the
pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing
private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a
result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not
believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible
(although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce
information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount
of resources required for such an attack would be significant.
However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have
to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer
an option since CVE-2016-0701.
Discovery 2022-01-28 Entry 2022-01-28 openssl
< 1.1.1m,1
openssl-devel
< 3.0.1
openssl-quictls
< 3.0.1
CVE-2021-4160
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220128.txt
|